All kidding aside, please always remember, it’s never a good idea to be “all in” or “all out”. It’s about being more exposed to markets you think will benefit from the current economic conditions and less exposed to markets you think will not benefit from the current economic environment. Right now I happen to be less exposed to the stock market as I’ve indicated previously and more exposed to cold hard cash and some treasuries.
Let’s move on and review some of what I think are key points in my opinion, regarding the overall economic environment.
Starting with the S&P earnings. If you go back to 1960, the average price of the S&P 500 to its underlying earnings (P/E ratio) ranged from 7 to 20. In the boom times of the irrational 90’s (remember the technology stocks and when everything .com went public?), P/E ratios were anywhere from 17, all the way up to 45 in 2001 before the first big bust. Today the P/E ratio, based on the earnings of the last three (3) quarters and the projected first quarter of 2012, is about 15.5. If we take the longer term range of between 7 and 20, we see that the 15.5 is in the upper half of the range. In addition, this is based on companies continuing to generate record earnings (by the way, Federal Express just recently guided their forecasted earnings for 2012 lower and stated the following, “The fourth quarter is still very good, we just don’t have as strong an economy as we would have hoped it would be a year ago.”). Nothing really to write home to Mom about.
Now that we’ve talked about the underlying earnings of stocks, let’s look at how stocks as a whole have been performing. The number of stocks making new 12 month highs is 324. For comparative purposes, I reported a few weeks ago that at the end of January, there were over 400 stocks making new highs and back at the end of March in 2011, there were over 600 stocks making new highs. Any reasonable person would think the market as a whole should have plenty of stocks participating by making new highs as the market itself makes new highs. The fact that there aren’t more leaves me with reason for concern.
Next we look at employment. The unemployment rate recently held its level of 8.3%, which is down from its peak over 10% back in late 2009. The calculation for the unemployment rate is the number of employed persons divided by the “available work force”. The next interesting question is how does this available workforce number compare to the population of the United States . In other words, are the same number of persons available for work as a percentage of the population as we’ve seen in the past. The following is a long term chart of the “participation rate” published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which calculates what percentage of the population is available for work.
You can see how throughout the 70’s and 80’s, the participation rate increased dramatically as more of the population entered the labor force. So what happened since 2001? Do all of these people that have dropped out of the labor force belong to families that don’t need the additional income? A small uptick in this participation rate to 65%, would leave us with an unemployment rate of 10%! I wish I belonged to one of these families that doesn’t need the additional income. I would be more than happy to become a statistic.Even as each passing week goes by and I am wrong on where to put my hard earned money, I happily sit on the sidelines underinvested in stocks. Until we see a nice correction where stocks get cheaper, I will remain an onlooker and enjoy reading how Apple will soon take over the world.
Joel Fink